Remembrance Day, 2004 -- Arafat -- RCMP, Drugs & Widows -- Paul Martin's Admission re Military Underfunding -- MP's & Allegiance to Canada
List of Articles:
* Update: Bud Talkinghorn
* A food fight
* Hollyweird wasn't boffo at the elections
* Remembrance Day, 2004
* Arafat's ghost
* Terrorist Dies: "Arafat to be buried in Ramallah after Israel-Palestinian compromise"
* Drugs: Response to BF who sent me an article on grow-ops in the Vernon area
* This Drug Trafficking problem is seriously escalating in Vernon, B. C.
* Why Are U.S. Drug Cops in Vancouver? -- Despite slams from a Supreme Court judge and civil liberties advocates, America’s DEA calls B.C. home.
* Marijuana big business on Vancouver Island says cop
* Plan to decriminalize small amounts of pot stokes growing criticism
* Pot smoker reprieve
* Mounties leave widows to pick up funeral tab
* Paul Martin admits share of blame for reduced spending on military -- other links based on a comment in this article
* MPs should pledge allegiance
A food fight
Two articles in the Wednesday, Nov. 11. 2004 National Post spoke, if not to my heart, than to my gut, Ann Kingston, one of the paper's strongest women writers, told of how we so easily get scammed by 'bistros' or 'new cuisine' joints. She profiles one chef in England. The simple pub fare of this place has been replaced by 'nouveau cuisine'. The chef had decided that he must awaken the dead taste buds of his clientele. His piece de resistence is scallops, laid over blood pudding and then smothered in hollandais sauce. If that wouldn't have affected the gag reflexes, then the fact that the scallops were rancid did. This foolishness is persistent in the culinary world. I guess I'm just old fashioned but the idea of sea bass (which in its Chileno home is really called something repulsive like "the razor-jawed cuttlefish--giant piranhas") is fine, but does it beat the humble salmon or halibut? Never having partaken off sea bass, I think it might be nice to let me taste its essence before the nouveau cusine or garnishes arrive on it. Does wasabi really compliment it? What about the puree of beets which which it is stuffed? Or now about that taste zinger--a basting with the broccoli juice/fennel sauce? I get so exited I start staring at the peanut butter jar and concocting recipes with it. I try not to let my fabulous satay recipe intrude on new adventures. Maybe peanut sauces will be the new nouveau cuisine and I can be in the vanguard. Watch for the newspaper ad for The Peanut Gallery -- and my up-coming TV show.
The second column was about the province-wide no smoking ban in Ontario and the damage it does to the hospitality industry. From a personal perspective, I will not go to a restaurant or bar that forbids smoking. I don't care if I am consigned to a pariah class, where the non-puffing crowd thinks I should be having after dinner conversations about my failure to follow through on my Twelve-step program.
Let us dispassionately look at what you get for your clear lung experience. You go to a restaurant and immediately you are faced with a bloated price for each item--when compared to home-prepared fare. The appetizers are the ultimate joke. Presentation is everything here. Those huge shells the two oysters nestle in are what makes you think there is nourishment inside. Take away the cream/cheese sauce and you are left with two tiny oysters. Two mouthfuls--$7.89 + tax + 10 to 20% tip on top of these first two. Ha! This is only the swift upper-cut for the next wallet-thumping rounds. Now comes the course with the jaw-dropping wine list. You are with friends, so don't want to pick some swill from the homeland. This causes you to scrutinize all items carefully. You hope your cost-chopping audit will be misaken for discernment. The choice is the Frontera chardonney from Chili. You do this because you know this one and because its price, when even grotesquely inflated, will not having you washing dishes. The main dish arrives. Your request for a medium rare porterhouse was construed as meaning charred to briquet level. You asked for the poisonous coldslaw to be omitted; however, you are faced with it slopped over every item on the plate. The smokey aftertaste of the steak helps cover up the vinegar-disguising bacterium of the slaw. Aghast at the ruinous atmosphere building, you relent and order dessert. To H*** with the cost, that double tunnel of fudge chocolate cake topped with maple sugar crust might redeem it all. Your inner sugar baby runs riot and you order another one for the partner (who is slimming) and you eat half of hers. The sugar rush helps keep you from looking stricken at the final tally. Who ordered that bogus Irish coffee--at $7.99? And who stencilled, "Industry-recommended 15% tip would be appreciated" on the top of the bill?
We won't even discuss the coffee prices, since we were told the beans were freshly ground. They don't mention if that was done in Indonesia. Nor will I dwell on one's fellow patrons, who still believe in dressing for dinner; albeit in thong-showing hiphuggers, a multiplicity of tattooes and metallic studs. Do try to to be facing the girl with the double tongue studs; it looks like a TV episode of Extreme Eating. Now one can still recover enough to go out to a restaurant again, but not if the pleasure of a few cigarettes while you swill the last of wine or liquers is removed. Plague me with your absurd prices, your ho-hum service, your ill-cooked food, but take away my right to light up and you have lost me forever. I think I have found the perfect way to forget this culinary nightmare. A slice of homemade brown bread, slathered with cheddar cheese -- or with just a hint of peanut swirl. And maybe a drag of a cigarette between each bite.
Kerry hitched his wagon to the stars, hoping (actually believing?) that the likes of a bunch of coddled stars, some with rather strange backgrounds and rehab records, could be put up as shining guardians of common values is bizarre. It simply highlighted a core superficiality that he has tried to hide. I was surprised he didn't snag Jane Fonda to duet with Susan Sarandon. The average American might admire their thespian skills, but that does not translate into their having any profound thoughts about foreign or social policy. I suspect that the dumbing down of movies, where the actor is a mere adjunct to the digalized special effects, is making them seem even more lightweight. The "cult of celebrity" that was supposed to dazzle little Miss Cornstalk in Ohio turned out to be a bust. She didn't find Janet Jackson flashing her tit during Super Bowl half-time in front of her extended family funny or even daring. She thought it was a further example of how far trash could be foisted on the unsuspecting public. The lefty elites thought it was an ironic statement. Kerry never saw that great divide. Militarily, they also saw not necessarily a Kerryesque Vietnam quagmire in Iraq coming up, but they did see another humiliating retreat orchestrated by him, with even greater consequences than in Vietnam. The Vietnamese never wanted to destroy our civilization, the new enemy does.
Today, we remember those who died for our freedom. We honour them for their extraordinary sacrifice to the cause of their families, their country and our future in a democratic society. We remember the world War 2 war workers--in dry docks, factories and more. We honour the World War 2 merchant marine men who suffered and died, only to suffer the indignity of having to fight for their pensions because they were not considered to be combatants. Tell that to the families of those who were killed at sea. May we never forget what they gave for us.
Further to this, yes, there are Western and North American values worth preserving and worth dying for. I am waiting for our government and its Liberal party to recognize these values and to protect them, instead of acting in their own best interests and to be re-elected.
God bless those who died in war, those who returned, and all their loved ones. God bless the rest of us who see what has happened to Canadian values since.
Arafat's ghost
It was almost amusing to see the previews of life after Arafat. It should be equally amusing to see the machinations that will attend his funeral. Hamas and the other fundamentalists are jockeying with numerous other factions to see who will wield power once the arch-terrorist is finally laid to rest. The dear wife, Suha--she of the secret bank accounts--had accused the delegation that showed up in Paris of being jackels. Now she supposedly is on two-cheek kissing terms with all them. Well, she ain't seen nothing yet. This old crowd may not be able to run a tiny state properly, but they sure are masters of intense intimidation.
It is interesting also to see the attention given to a man who privately probably shouted hysterical "Allah akbars" when the twin towers fell. His true legacy will be teeming slums filled with kids who have bought his cult of death message. There is also a very, very, disturbing movement amongst our young to see all these Islamic zealots as some kind of re-born Che Gueveras. "The West deserved to be hit because it wants ALL the world's oil" is casually tossed off the lefts' tongues. Norway and Veneuela must be waiting for the invasions.
They should try to watch The Hamburg Cell which BBC produced. Let them see Atta and Jarrah as they were--sexually frustrated, logic-defying, xenophobes. Young men who had nothing to give so they became death lovers. They are not revolutionary heroes; they are Harris and Klebold if Columbine had been a massively larger arena. This nilhilistic mindset is what the future will remember Arafat for.
Terrorist Dies: "Arafat to be buried in Ramallah after Israel-Palestinian compromise"
Today, listen for the respectful tones used in reporting the details of this terrorist's death -- tones reserved for such as he, emitted by our mainstream media, the CBC especially, though not the only source of treacle.
In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless his soul."
God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed, with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity. [. . . . ]
You can extrapolate from all this as to why the Palestinians should be better off without his thuggery and appropriation of international aid money to train little terrorists instead of educating the children -- after sending a goodly part to bank accounts abroad. The Palestinians would be wise to pursue peace with different leadership.
Arafat deserves no tears nor respect. I cannot wish that he rest in peace; if anyone deserves a disturbed afterlife, it is Arafat. Maybe a good stint in the worst of Purgatory would be a start -- then on to the hellfires of damnation.
No, I am not politically correct. Should I be? Why? I can read, I can reach my own conclusions, and I do not have to hew the party line, as, presumably, do our "trusted, connected" media types.
JERUSALEM - Israel and the Palestinian Authority agreed Wednesday that the Palestinian leader would be buried in his shell-pocked compound in the West Bank town of Ramallah, a rare and hopeful sign of co-operation that many in the Middle East hope bodes well for the era after Yasser Arafat dies. [. . . . ]
Drugs: Response to BF who sent me an article on grow-ops in the Vernon area.
This Drug Trafficking problem is seriously escalating in Vernon, B. C.
It involves a number of wealthy Hispanics who operate (Control) in the Vernon and surrounding Area, and are tapping the local traffickers - causing a major problem in the Community. There is also a large amount of drugs being handled through this Vernon Drug Trafficking Operation that is part of the well known 'Drug Triangle of British Columbia' - Kamloops, Salmon Arm, Kelowna. [. . . . ]
BF, you indicated that you feel not enough is being done by local RCMP. I notice that you have sent this information to a few people and/or agencies. Note the following for other possibilities if you do not see action and feel satisfied.
Sometimes police officers have undercover operations going on and they don't want to blow it when they are after bigger fish. However, if you wish, you may send information to Leo Knight of Primetime crime or Andrew McIntosh at the National Post. If you believe RCMP are looking the other way, you may send information to RCMP internal affairs, anonymously. Check the sites below for phone numbers and addresses, including the US DEA in Seattle.
Canadians will be madder than hell after they read Stewart Bell's shocking account of how the Canadian government has allowed Sikh, Tamil and Islamic terrorists to come into our home and turn it into a safe house for international terror.
Contact the National Post by telephoning (416) 383-2300 or faxing (416) 442-2209 and they may tell you how to contact Stewart Bell, in particular, as I do not have his email address.
Seattle Division (206) 553-5443
Anchorage, AK (907) 271-5033
Bend, OR (541) 385-8798
Blaine, WA (360) 332-8692
Boise, ID (208) 334-1620
Eugene, OR (541) 465-6861
Fairbanks, AK (907) 455-1818
Medford, OR (541) 776-4260
Portland, OR (503) 326-3371
Salem, OR (503) 399-5902
Spokane, WA (509) 353-2964
Tacoma, WA (253) 383-7901
Tri-Cities, Kennewick, WA (509) 374-3444
Yakima, WA (509) 454-4407
Strange but true: the American Secret Service in Vancouver is listed in the phonebook, but the Drug Enforcement Administration is not. This seems to be a measure of just how secretive the DEA is. They opened shop quietly in Vancouver last year, but the public has little idea of what they are doing—let alone that they are here—and the DEA would like to keep it that way.
“How did you get my phone number?” is the first thing Vancouver DEA agent Kenneth Peterson asks in a booming voice. If it’s classified, he’d best notify his counterparts at the DEA office in Seattle, as they gave it to me.
He sidesteps nearly all my questions, praising the beauty of the city instead. The only information he would divulge is that the DEA has three people here—and that others are “in and out”—and they came to town in June 2003. “Vancouver does have some drug problems, otherwise we wouldn’t be here,” he says. [. . . . ]
Former mayor had no idea [. . . . ]
Treaty promotes joint operations
We shouldn’t worry about the DEA, says Vancouver mayor Larry Campbell, a former RCMP officer. “Even before they had an office here, we did joint operations with them.” Since 1990, a mutual legal assistance treaty between Canada and the U.S. has allowed officers of each country to share databases and other information to fight cross-border crime. [. . . . ]
Marijuana big business on Vancouver Island says cop
DUNCAN (BC Newspaper Group) — Cowichan cops are barely touching the roots of the Valley's growing commercial drug problem.
And they won't until more resources are freed up to tackle the organized crime problem, according to North Cowichan/Duncan's top cop.
RCMP Inspector Linton Robinson estimates up to 600 local grow-ops producing high- potency marijuana bud that fetches up to $4,000 a pound in the United States are active within his detachment area.
"We're lucky if we know of 25 per cent of grow-ops.
"We've identified 60 grow-ops in our detachment so far this year but only 15 have been busted. That's only because of our resources; we just can't get around to them all."
Instead, his officers prioritize indoor grow-op busts based on size and theft of hydropower. [. . . . ]
"Pot's worth more than cocaine in the States and they're taking it over in hockey bags," he says, lamenting it takes drug cases longer to filter through Canada's judicial system compared to the American courts.
"The kingpins are making big bucks and the little guys (dealers) are getting picked off by the police." [. . . . ]
Read this one. Note the suggestions given for funding. It works for one county in Florida, I have heard. (I think it is Volusia County but check.)
Note the problems for police officers:
* Lack of resources -- documented previously in several articles on this website -- It costs $$$ to go to court and our security forces are underfunded compared to those who, though the proceeds of their criminal activity, are flush with money for high-priced lawyers.
* Physical dangers--firearms, booby traps, and more--used by thugs to protect their turf
* Slow-paced, paperwork-intensive prosecutions -- and now our government is considering decriminalizing those caught with "small" amounts of marijuana (see link below); yet, the government has not legalized / decriminalized growing those "small" amounts. Just who is going to supply it? Why is growing illegal and possession of a certain amount not illegal? Illogical!
Note the problems for all Canadians of this hypocrisy on the part of our government. The government has done everything it could to aid the criminal activity and criminals--see past posts. Either a product is illegal or it is not. What are the those charged with upholding the law to do? Ignore it?
* We are warned by the US Ambassador Cellucci that decriminalizing marijuana could bring massive border problems since marijuana is illegal in the US -- the country with which Canadians have the highest levels of trade. Think what crossing the border would be like in future both for the goods and for the individual. Do we really want to go down this road in pursuit of a nebulous "independence" from American influence?
Note what our Prime Minister has chosen to take as his, "definitively not American", important issue.
"Canada makes its own laws," Prime Minister Paul Martin said Wednesday when asked about the issue. He declined to elaborate, saying the pot bill will be scrutinized by a parliamentary committee.
Remember, police stand in for Canadians like you and me who do not want to have to go near the dangerous criminal underbelly which exists and is growing -- thanks to years of one party rule and corruption.
Plan to decriminalize small amounts of pot stokes growing criticism
OTTAWA (CP) - The Liberal government's bid to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana faces growing resistance from police, American officials and opposition politicians.
Critics - including those wielding the powerful threat of Canada-U.S. trade hold-ups - have taken aim at related legislation reintroduced by the minority Liberals. A previous bill died when the federal election was called in the spring. From quantity limits to enforcement and training, police across Canada have major concerns, says the head of the Canadian Professional Police Association.
"It's putting the cart before the horse," said president Tony Cannavino, representing 54,000 officers and members.
"The government should have started first of all with a national drug strategy instead of going forward with a bill decriminalizing marijuana," he said Wednesday in an interview. "It's sending the wrong message to kids."
The association does not believe anyone caught with one or two joints should get a criminal record, Cannavino stressed. "We think it's exaggerated."
But police have big problems with a bill that would fine adults $150 and minors $100 for possessing up to 15 grams, he said. "That represents between 30 and 50 joints of marijuana."
For heavens' sakes, I've seen the reaction on a person of ONE marijuana cigarette; there is definitely an effect. There are studies concerning its effect -- benign and harmful. It is time for honesty. It is time for open discussion in Parliament, not in the Liberal government's back rooms and in caucus. All Parliamentarians must have input into something as serious as this. And don't forget what happens if Canada legalizes--sorry, decriminalizes--some pot possession and the US does not.
Or is there a master plan behind decriminalization? First we decriminalize; then we find we must provide it for all sorts of reasons--medical, for example; then those who knew this was coming would be ideally placed for getting into the supply business. Or am I too too cynical?
It's a shift of tactics in the war on drugs. People with small amounts of marijuana are not being ignored by Kelowna RCMP but they're also not feeling the heat like they used to. It's very rare these days to see people in court charged with simple marijuana possession. To make best use of police resources, Kelowna RCMP are going after big scale dope operations and not the individual user. The trend is the same across the country. Last year, the number of Canadians charged with marijuana possession fell by 30%. "It makes sense for our unit to go after the dealers and organized crime and people profiting from dispensing these drugs into our community," says Kelowna RCMP Cpl. Reg Burgess. The federal government has reintroduced legislation which decriminalizes possession of small amounts of marijuana but considerably toughens penalties for major pot producers.
He had a lustrous 33 year career in the Force and his death was a shock to all who knew him. The RCMP reacted with all the pomp and ceremony one might expect for a senior serving member. The Commissioner and other dignitaries flew out from Ottawa for the funeral and members turned out from across the country along with municipal police officers from all over Canada and the US.
Lesley Massey was concerned about the size and cost of the funeral. She was told not to worry about it that everything would be taken care of. She was mis-led.
After all the members marched and stood in respectful silence, after the piper played the last lament, after the last toast was made at the wake, Lesley Massey was given a bill for $20,891.00.
On May 23, 2003, the RCMP added his name to their memorial wall in “K” division headquarters in Edmonton. To this day they are refusing to pay the bill for the funeral. [. . . . ]
This is not good. I know the RCMP are having trouble operating with present funding after years of cutbacks, but . . . . Surely, a more modest funeral is needed if the RCMP cannot afford to fund the red-coated display for one of their own. As for government funding to cover this kind of thing, our government is not at all concerned with what is right or seemly. They are callous about all except themselves and their "friends", such as the Sponsorship/Adscam/slush fund group, and the other hangers-on. It is disgusting.
Paul Martin admits share of blame for reduced spending on military
CFB VALCARTIER, Que. -- [. . . . ] "We have to turn around our dwindling investment which, I admit, I have a certain responsibility for causing,'' Martin said.
"Your superiors here are just too polite to say it,'' he added, causing scattered laughter among the soldiers.
Martin was finance minister in the 1990s when the military suffered deep cuts and reduced troop levels.
No wonder there was scattered laughter. Actually, your career is moribund if you cross your political masters -- whether military, RCMP, other securtity / policing services. Do you really think that top officers stay at the top in Ottawa unless they go along with what the [Liberal] government wants?
Further to the above final comment, check Orwell Today. There are several articles listed, among them, the following--very interesting, but check for yourself.
[. . . . ] In a two-page Memorandum of Conversation dated May 7, 1952, a U.S. State Department official recounts a conversation with George Ignatieff, then second-in-command at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, who approached him to discuss Mr. Trudeau's "indiscreet" behaviour at a conference in Moscow. [. . . . ]
Ottawa historical researcher Christopher Cook, who uncovered Mr. Ford's memo to the Canadian government about the incident, said the U.S. might have kept the State Department document secret to protect the Canadian government. [. . . . ]
What I found even more interesting were the links on this site. A caveat: while there are links to mainstream news articles, I have to read more to know what I think of all of it. The content is intriguing. Check out, for example:
There are other links; these are just a sample. When I think of the topics covered on this site and what I have already learned, I begin to read more -- and question more. Think of the potential sale of Canadian assets to China and Russian "companies", ones either owned by government or connected to a criminal underbelly both in China and Russia -- for example, to the the underground characters who emerged after the Wall came down in Russia, or so I read. Think of the give-away of vast stretches of all Canadians' northern lands to a few Natives on the basis of their "memories" and what they think they deserve. Think about the tie-in between international business and Canadians in positions of power and influence, to say nothing of the corruption we already know about here. Think -- and read some more. Perhaps, it will be useful to you, as well.
Why is anyone surprised at rookie Bloc MP Andre Bellavance's refusal to send a Canadian flag to a Quebec veterans group?
The guy's a separatist, for heaven's sake, as is the Bloc Quebecois party. Their goal, not-so-pure but simple, is the break-up of Canada and establishing Quebec as a sovereign state.
Bellavance's statement, "I don't feel any obligation to distribute Canadian flags," is probably what all Bloc MPs feel, though not all would be so candid.
[. . . . ] Ever since the Bloc first emerged as a federal force -- and we should remember that when the conservatives were in limbo, the Bloc was the official opposition -- I and others fretted that they are a scorpion held to the country's breast.
I've never understood why MPs, when elected, are not required to pledge allegiance to the country they ostensibly serve, and which pays their salary and perks.
MPs are required to pledge allegiance to the Queen and her heirs -- but not to Canada. If this isn't an archaic formality, nothing is. [. . . . ]